<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/</link>
	<description>Weblog of the Pro-Life Action League's Youth Outreach Division</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-8744</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-8744</guid>
		<description>Sorry, i didnt keep up on this post.. midterms are a pain.

Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but you need ovarian cysts to get pregnant, and I had them, but they were painful.  Birth control pills get rid of the cysts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, i didnt keep up on this post.. midterms are a pain.</p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but you need ovarian cysts to get pregnant, and I had them, but they were painful.  Birth control pills get rid of the cysts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7376</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7376</guid>
		<description>Pansy,

And your point was well made.  I think Lauren brought it back to contraception because that&#039;s what this blog is about...

As for Napro, I wish there were more places you could go to for it.  It&#039;s going to be a hard sell for my daughter-in-law because all the clinics are so far away.  She would be going for health reasons and not moral ones, so I don&#039;t know how committed she is to trying alternative therapy.

Of course, we can only hope that in the future, all female medicine goes the way Napro does.  It&#039;s obviously the best way.

You&#039;re right, it&#039;s all about good health OPTIONS for women, regardless of religion...

MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pansy,</p>
<p>And your point was well made.  I think Lauren brought it back to contraception because that&#8217;s what this blog is about&#8230;</p>
<p>As for Napro, I wish there were more places you could go to for it.  It&#8217;s going to be a hard sell for my daughter-in-law because all the clinics are so far away.  She would be going for health reasons and not moral ones, so I don&#8217;t know how committed she is to trying alternative therapy.</p>
<p>Of course, we can only hope that in the future, all female medicine goes the way Napro does.  It&#8217;s obviously the best way.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s all about good health OPTIONS for women, regardless of religion&#8230;</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pansy Moss</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7371</link>
		<dc:creator>Pansy Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7371</guid>
		<description>Lauren,

I reread your post and I misread. I apologise. But I didn&#039;t mean the recommend as a moral/religious debate about birth control. That is why when I saw this:
&lt;i&gt;It’s not like the Catholics have a ban on medicine or something. Please correct me if I’m wrong. &lt;/i&gt; 

I got kind of defensive because while birth control for me is not an option for religious and moral reasons, good health options for women are regardless of religion.

An example would be I don&#039;t want my kids to have cavaties, so I limit their intake of sugary treats, and make them brush their teeth. If someone said to me  &quot;oh, you don&#039;t let them have lots of jellybeans because your Catholic, right? But don&#039;t Catholics allow candy and dentists? Correct me if I&#039;m wrong.&quot; I would find that annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren,</p>
<p>I reread your post and I misread. I apologise. But I didn&#8217;t mean the recommend as a moral/religious debate about birth control. That is why when I saw this:<br />
<i>It’s not like the Catholics have a ban on medicine or something. Please correct me if I’m wrong. </i> </p>
<p>I got kind of defensive because while birth control for me is not an option for religious and moral reasons, good health options for women are regardless of religion.</p>
<p>An example would be I don&#8217;t want my kids to have cavaties, so I limit their intake of sugary treats, and make them brush their teeth. If someone said to me  &#8220;oh, you don&#8217;t let them have lots of jellybeans because your Catholic, right? But don&#8217;t Catholics allow candy and dentists? Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.&#8221; I would find that annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pansy Moss</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7365</link>
		<dc:creator>Pansy Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7365</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why do you think Lauren was being contrary. She went to the site. She made a joke, and now she is asking us to reiterate why we are opposed to birth control…&lt;/i&gt;

Because my reference was not about being contradictory to birth control, it was about women&#039;s health. Instead she turned it into a debate about birth control after I said that my reference was not about the moral aspects of birth control.

The Pill does not cure ovarian cysts, or many other women&#039;s health disorders that are treated by the Pill. It justs masks the symptoms (and very often contributes to the underlying problem). NaPro technology has success in curing things like ovarian cysts, PCOS, and post partum depression.

Anyway, I think women deserve better than simply being sterilized instead of cured out of a political agenda and doctor&#039;s laziness. With my pregnancies, I have hired certified professional midwives for care. I am pretty sure not one of them is pro-life, but they all advocate taking personal responsibility to one&#039;s health. It is not about a political agenda, it is about doing what is best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why do you think Lauren was being contrary. She went to the site. She made a joke, and now she is asking us to reiterate why we are opposed to birth control…</i></p>
<p>Because my reference was not about being contradictory to birth control, it was about women&#8217;s health. Instead she turned it into a debate about birth control after I said that my reference was not about the moral aspects of birth control.</p>
<p>The Pill does not cure ovarian cysts, or many other women&#8217;s health disorders that are treated by the Pill. It justs masks the symptoms (and very often contributes to the underlying problem). NaPro technology has success in curing things like ovarian cysts, PCOS, and post partum depression.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think women deserve better than simply being sterilized instead of cured out of a political agenda and doctor&#8217;s laziness. With my pregnancies, I have hired certified professional midwives for care. I am pretty sure not one of them is pro-life, but they all advocate taking personal responsibility to one&#8217;s health. It is not about a political agenda, it is about doing what is best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generations for Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Responding to Injustice</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Generations for Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Responding to Injustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>[...] Regarding last week&#8217;s outrageous New York state court ruling that religious social service groups must pay for employees&#8217; birth control coverage &#8212; even if the groups believe that contraception is sinful &#8212; we issued this press release today: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Regarding last week&#8217;s outrageous New York state court ruling that religious social service groups must pay for employees&#8217; birth control coverage &#8212; even if the groups believe that contraception is sinful &#8212; we issued this press release today: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7348</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7348</guid>
		<description>Pansy,

Why do you think Lauren was being contrary.  She went to the site. She made a joke, and now  she is asking us to reiterate why we are opposed to birth control...

What did I miss?

MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pansy,</p>
<p>Why do you think Lauren was being contrary.  She went to the site. She made a joke, and now  she is asking us to reiterate why we are opposed to birth control&#8230;</p>
<p>What did I miss?</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pansy Moss</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7301</link>
		<dc:creator>Pansy Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7301</guid>
		<description>Sorry Lauren,

I thought you were honestly saying that ovarian cysts were an issue that you were addressing, as opposed to simply coming and being contrary. Tried to help from one woman to another. I was wrong. I won&#039;t make the same mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Lauren,</p>
<p>I thought you were honestly saying that ovarian cysts were an issue that you were addressing, as opposed to simply coming and being contrary. Tried to help from one woman to another. I was wrong. I won&#8217;t make the same mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys I didnt get to read everything.. I saw that site that Pansy posted and I grabbed myself and almost passed out.. Tmi i know, but seriously, now I know what guys feel when they see another guy get hit in the balls.  OMG that looked so painful!  Did you see the pictures I&#039;m referring to?  Looks like I&#039;m a bad candidate for childbirth huh lol.

Can i ask you guys something though?  I dont understand why artificial contraception like the rhythm method are acceptable when their ends are the same?  You are trying in essence to prevent pregnancy.  Arent you not supposed  to do that?  It&#039;s not like the Catholics have a ban on medicine or something.  Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys I didnt get to read everything.. I saw that site that Pansy posted and I grabbed myself and almost passed out.. Tmi i know, but seriously, now I know what guys feel when they see another guy get hit in the balls.  OMG that looked so painful!  Did you see the pictures I&#8217;m referring to?  Looks like I&#8217;m a bad candidate for childbirth huh lol.</p>
<p>Can i ask you guys something though?  I dont understand why artificial contraception like the rhythm method are acceptable when their ends are the same?  You are trying in essence to prevent pregnancy.  Arent you not supposed  to do that?  It&#8217;s not like the Catholics have a ban on medicine or something.  Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>WASHINGTON, October 20, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. bishops will vote on a proposed document, &quot;Happy Are Those Who Are Called To His Supper: On Preparing To Receive Christ Worthily in the Eucharist&quot; during their annual November meeting in Baltimore, Nov. 13-16.

The document, addressed to all the faithful, points out that Catholics may not receive communion if they do not accept Church teaching on matters such as abortion and homosexuality.  Catholics should refrain from Holy Communion, says the document, &quot;when they lack adherence to what the Church authoritatively teaches on matters of faith and morals.

The letter from Cardinal Ratzinger to the US Bishops continued, &quot;Regarding the grave sin of abortion or euthanasia, when a person&#039;s formal cooperation becomes manifest (understood, in the case of a Catholic politician, as his consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws), his Pastor should meet with him, instructing him about the Church&#039;s teaching, informing him that he is not to present himself for Holy Communion until he brings to an end the objective situation of sin, and warning him that he will otherwise be denied the Eucharist.&quot; ...

&quot;When these precautionary measures have not had their effect or in which they were not possible,&quot; concluded the Cardinal &quot;and the person in question, with obstinate persistence, still presents himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, the minister of Holy Communion must refuse to distribute it.&quot;  (see the full letter from Cardinal Ratzinger: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/apr/050419a.html )


Lauren, this refers to what I said about women who have had abortions...

I don&#039;t know if you saw where John added that the woman must be aware of her sin, but there you have it.  Recieving communion is serious business and must be done with the utmost sincerity and the cleanest of souls...

MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, October 20, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) &#8211; The U.S. bishops will vote on a proposed document, &#8220;Happy Are Those Who Are Called To His Supper: On Preparing To Receive Christ Worthily in the Eucharist&#8221; during their annual November meeting in Baltimore, Nov. 13-16.</p>
<p>The document, addressed to all the faithful, points out that Catholics may not receive communion if they do not accept Church teaching on matters such as abortion and homosexuality.  Catholics should refrain from Holy Communion, says the document, &#8220;when they lack adherence to what the Church authoritatively teaches on matters of faith and morals.</p>
<p>The letter from Cardinal Ratzinger to the US Bishops continued, &#8220;Regarding the grave sin of abortion or euthanasia, when a person&#8217;s formal cooperation becomes manifest (understood, in the case of a Catholic politician, as his consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws), his Pastor should meet with him, instructing him about the Church&#8217;s teaching, informing him that he is not to present himself for Holy Communion until he brings to an end the objective situation of sin, and warning him that he will otherwise be denied the Eucharist.&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;When these precautionary measures have not had their effect or in which they were not possible,&#8221; concluded the Cardinal &#8220;and the person in question, with obstinate persistence, still presents himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, the minister of Holy Communion must refuse to distribute it.&#8221;  (see the full letter from Cardinal Ratzinger: <a href="http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/apr/050419a.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/apr/050419a.html</a> )</p>
<p>Lauren, this refers to what I said about women who have had abortions&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you saw where John added that the woman must be aware of her sin, but there you have it.  Recieving communion is serious business and must be done with the utmost sincerity and the cleanest of souls&#8230;</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6966</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6966</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been keeping up with this MS thingy, and I&#039;m thinking...
Maybe we should publish a petition of 5000 people who have cheated on their spouses, or taxes, or entrance exams.  Just because 5000 people do something, doesn&#039;t mean what they did was right.  

How about 5000 signatures of men who beat their wives?  Or 5000 rapists who think it&#039;s perfectly okay to rape women?  Or...well you get the picture...

MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been keeping up with this MS thingy, and I&#8217;m thinking&#8230;<br />
Maybe we should publish a petition of 5000 people who have cheated on their spouses, or taxes, or entrance exams.  Just because 5000 people do something, doesn&#8217;t mean what they did was right.  </p>
<p>How about 5000 signatures of men who beat their wives?  Or 5000 rapists who think it&#8217;s perfectly okay to rape women?  Or&#8230;well you get the picture&#8230;</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6965</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6965</guid>
		<description>Pansy,

That is so funny.  I was just on their website hoping to help my daughter-in-law (she has excessive bleeding), when I read Laurens post.  I came on just now to tell her about NaPro...

See Lauren, that&#039;s how the Big Guy works...He wants you to be well but not be sinful...so He got this info to you through two of His believers...New meaning to Amazing Grace...

MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pansy,</p>
<p>That is so funny.  I was just on their website hoping to help my daughter-in-law (she has excessive bleeding), when I read Laurens post.  I came on just now to tell her about NaPro&#8230;</p>
<p>See Lauren, that&#8217;s how the Big Guy works&#8230;He wants you to be well but not be sinful&#8230;so He got this info to you through two of His believers&#8230;New meaning to Amazing Grace&#8230;</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pansy Moss</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>Pansy Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>I have had ovarian cysts and they are quite painful. I had one burst once many years ago...Yeesh.

Just for a sec, let&#039;s put aside the fact that I am not pro-contraception, but in the interests of the arguments you put forth:expense and bad reactions to medication:

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naprotechnology.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NaPro Technology&lt;/a&gt;. It has been more effective in &lt;b&gt;curing&lt;/b&gt; women&#039;s healthcare issues not just numbing the side effects like the Pill does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had ovarian cysts and they are quite painful. I had one burst once many years ago&#8230;Yeesh.</p>
<p>Just for a sec, let&#8217;s put aside the fact that I am not pro-contraception, but in the interests of the arguments you put forth:expense and bad reactions to medication:</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.naprotechnology.com/" rel="nofollow">NaPro Technology</a>. It has been more effective in <b>curing</b> women&#8217;s healthcare issues not just numbing the side effects like the Pill does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6925</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6925</guid>
		<description>I have ovarian cysts so I have to take them regardless to keep painful ones from developing.  But that&#039;s besides the point, I want to stay responsible and take birth control while I&#039;m sexually active nor want to have children at the moment.

I go to Planned Parenthood.  There is no pay-scale thing that I am aware of.  The only difference in price between PP and my original OB-gyn was price of the exam, which was only 35 dollars. I can only take really low-dose birth control, hence the ring, because the higher-dose makes me feel nauseated a few days out of the month.   It was too much of an inconvenience getting sick like that.  Take that with a grain of salt though and don&#039;t take it as a mark against contraception or hormonal birth control.  I get sick on almost every type of prescribed medicine.  I went on a medication for a completely unrelated illness and almost had to be admitted to the hospital.  We all react differently to medication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have ovarian cysts so I have to take them regardless to keep painful ones from developing.  But that&#8217;s besides the point, I want to stay responsible and take birth control while I&#8217;m sexually active nor want to have children at the moment.</p>
<p>I go to Planned Parenthood.  There is no pay-scale thing that I am aware of.  The only difference in price between PP and my original OB-gyn was price of the exam, which was only 35 dollars. I can only take really low-dose birth control, hence the ring, because the higher-dose makes me feel nauseated a few days out of the month.   It was too much of an inconvenience getting sick like that.  Take that with a grain of salt though and don&#8217;t take it as a mark against contraception or hormonal birth control.  I get sick on almost every type of prescribed medicine.  I went on a medication for a completely unrelated illness and almost had to be admitted to the hospital.  We all react differently to medication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6924</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6924</guid>
		<description>The question is not whether they are expensive but whether they are medicine.

They are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is not whether they are expensive but whether they are medicine.</p>
<p>They are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6883</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6883</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t there places that base the cost on how much a person makes?  I remember going to a health clinic when I was younger because I couldn&#039;t afford medical insurance and they had a pay scale based on how much a person made, I actually was sent for an ultrasound done on my stomach and I never had to pay a dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t there places that base the cost on how much a person makes?  I remember going to a health clinic when I was younger because I couldn&#8217;t afford medical insurance and they had a pay scale based on how much a person made, I actually was sent for an ultrasound done on my stomach and I never had to pay a dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6879</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6879</guid>
		<description>Im on my mom&#039;s loyola plan and my contraceptives aren&#039;t covered. It is very expensive for me at 40 dollars a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im on my mom&#8217;s loyola plan and my contraceptives aren&#8217;t covered. It is very expensive for me at 40 dollars a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pansy Moss</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6872</link>
		<dc:creator>Pansy Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6872</guid>
		<description>Of course in Albany...So tired...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course in Albany&#8230;So tired&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6871</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6871</guid>
		<description>You would think so right?  How much does birth control cost anyway? I find it interesting that a woman can always find a way to afford an abortion, but they complain when they have to buy their own birth control.  They should just stop hiring women if you ask me, they&#039;re becoming too destructive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think so right?  How much does birth control cost anyway? I find it interesting that a woman can always find a way to afford an abortion, but they complain when they have to buy their own birth control.  They should just stop hiring women if you ask me, they&#8217;re becoming too destructive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolia</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6863</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1020/not-good/#comment-6863</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t the employees choose to work at these places?  If the charities were to write these things into their contracts would they be able to get around the court ruling?  This makes no sense to me.  By choosing to work (or not to work) at a place of employment, doesn&#039;t an employee make a decision to live by and at least tolerate if not accept the employer&#039;s values and decisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t the employees choose to work at these places?  If the charities were to write these things into their contracts would they be able to get around the court ruling?  This makes no sense to me.  By choosing to work (or not to work) at a place of employment, doesn&#8217;t an employee make a decision to live by and at least tolerate if not accept the employer&#8217;s values and decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

