<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-Life Bias in the Mainstream Media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/</link>
	<description>Weblog of the Pro-Life Action League's Youth Outreach Division</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-11871</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-11871</guid>
		<description>And what happen in 25 years when babies can survive outside of a womb on the day they are concieved?  Granted they will need help, but with the advances we are making it is possible.

I think someone has said this before.  The difference between babies that are allowed to live and those that die are the subjective view of the mothers.  A baby at 6 weeks in utero that is wanted is revered.  A baby at 6 weeks in utero that is not wanted is garbage.  The baby has not changed.  That is objective. The only thing that changes is the point of view of the woman carrying the child. That is subjective.  

Can we truly rationalize abortion using subjective criteria?
Can a human life truly be weighed by whether it is wanted or not?  I would hate to think I was being judged by that criteria.
MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what happen in 25 years when babies can survive outside of a womb on the day they are concieved?  Granted they will need help, but with the advances we are making it is possible.</p>
<p>I think someone has said this before.  The difference between babies that are allowed to live and those that die are the subjective view of the mothers.  A baby at 6 weeks in utero that is wanted is revered.  A baby at 6 weeks in utero that is not wanted is garbage.  The baby has not changed.  That is objective. The only thing that changes is the point of view of the woman carrying the child. That is subjective.  </p>
<p>Can we truly rationalize abortion using subjective criteria?<br />
Can a human life truly be weighed by whether it is wanted or not?  I would hate to think I was being judged by that criteria.<br />
MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-11815</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-11815</guid>
		<description>Because of viability and feeling of pain.  I believe that baby has potential to survive outside of its mother womb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of viability and feeling of pain.  I believe that baby has potential to survive outside of its mother womb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10960</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10960</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;For the record there are a lot of moderate pro-choice people like myself that don’t believe in third trimester abortion and this procedure in particular.&lt;/i&gt;

Lauren,

Why not? Why do you not believe in abortion after 180 days or 6 months (entering the third trimester)?

What happens to the baby in the mothers womb on day 181 for you all of the sudden not to believe in abortion on this particular day going forward?

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>For the record there are a lot of moderate pro-choice people like myself that don’t believe in third trimester abortion and this procedure in particular.</i></p>
<p>Lauren,</p>
<p>Why not? Why do you not believe in abortion after 180 days or 6 months (entering the third trimester)?</p>
<p>What happens to the baby in the mothers womb on day 181 for you all of the sudden not to believe in abortion on this particular day going forward?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10584</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10584</guid>
		<description>Would you think it is justified to label those who, on the other hand, believe abortion should be legal at any point in pregnancy as “extremists”?

It depends.  I think there are legalistic reasons that many say they want to keep abortion legal in all three trimesters.  if you concede on some parts, you risk giving legally the other parts away.  If there were away to give away some parts of legal abortion and maintain what the majority in America believes should be legal, I would be for it.

People who believe that abortion should be legal in all three trimesters without regard to reason why other than &quot;freedom&quot;, are in fact as you say, extremists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you think it is justified to label those who, on the other hand, believe abortion should be legal at any point in pregnancy as “extremists”?</p>
<p>It depends.  I think there are legalistic reasons that many say they want to keep abortion legal in all three trimesters.  if you concede on some parts, you risk giving legally the other parts away.  If there were away to give away some parts of legal abortion and maintain what the majority in America believes should be legal, I would be for it.</p>
<p>People who believe that abortion should be legal in all three trimesters without regard to reason why other than &#8220;freedom&#8221;, are in fact as you say, extremists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10550</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10550</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lauren said: &quot;For the record there are a lot of moderate pro-choice people like myself that don’t believe in third trimester abortion and this procedure in particular.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

You&#039;re right: Among self-styled pro-choicers, those who want to maintain the status quo in the U. S. -- keeping abortion legal throughout all three trimesters -- are a distinct minority.  

I&#039;m curious, Lauren: As you&#039;re well aware, I&#039;m sure, we who believe abortion not be legal under any circumstances, or at any point in pregnancy, are often labeled &quot;extremists&quot;.

Would you think it is justified to label those who, on the other hand, believe abortion should be legal at any point in pregnancy as &quot;extremists&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lauren said: &#8220;For the record there are a lot of moderate pro-choice people like myself that don’t believe in third trimester abortion and this procedure in particular.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>You&#8217;re right: Among self-styled pro-choicers, those who want to maintain the status quo in the U. S. &#8212; keeping abortion legal throughout all three trimesters &#8212; are a distinct minority.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, Lauren: As you&#8217;re well aware, I&#8217;m sure, we who believe abortion not be legal under any circumstances, or at any point in pregnancy, are often labeled &#8220;extremists&#8221;.</p>
<p>Would you think it is justified to label those who, on the other hand, believe abortion should be legal at any point in pregnancy as &#8220;extremists&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10470</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10470</guid>
		<description>Rosie,

Even if the photo was faked, the message is still loud and clear...and true. Awesome!

MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosie,</p>
<p>Even if the photo was faked, the message is still loud and clear&#8230;and true. Awesome!</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10352</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10352</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen this?

http://www.askmehelpdesk.com/photography/photo-gurus-do-you-think-doctored-25408.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen this?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.askmehelpdesk.com/photography/photo-gurus-do-you-think-doctored-25408.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.askmehelpdesk.com/photography/photo-gurus-do-you-think-doctored-25408.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10330</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10330</guid>
		<description>For the record there are a lot of moderate pro-choice people like myself that don&#039;t believe in third trimester abortion and this procedure in particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record there are a lot of moderate pro-choice people like myself that don&#8217;t believe in third trimester abortion and this procedure in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10293</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10293</guid>
		<description>The Left pitches a hissy fit any time anybody doesn&#039;t entirely toe their line. How *dare* the MSM refer to a law by the law&#039;s name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left pitches a hissy fit any time anybody doesn&#8217;t entirely toe their line. How *dare* the MSM refer to a law by the law&#8217;s name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary kay</title>
		<link>http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10284</link>
		<dc:creator>mary kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://generationsforlife.org/2006/1106/pro-life-bias-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-10284</guid>
		<description>This from a group that used to refer to abortion as &quot;having a procedure&quot; done...

Quite honestly, I think dilation and extraction is even more inhumane and graphic sounding than partial birth...

I can tell you that if I sat at the dinner table and discussed partial birth abortion,  my 17 year old son would not even blink and eye. But if I started discussing &quot;dilating&quot; my cervix and then &quot;extracting&quot; a dead baby...well, he&#039;d get up and leave...We all know how men react to anything descriptive pertaining to &quot;WOMEN&#039;S ISSUES&quot;   Can&#039;t you just hear them all going &quot;ooooooo,...gross!)

So go ahead, call it dilation and extraction.  And then when people ask you what that is, tell them...
MK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from a group that used to refer to abortion as &#8220;having a procedure&#8221; done&#8230;</p>
<p>Quite honestly, I think dilation and extraction is even more inhumane and graphic sounding than partial birth&#8230;</p>
<p>I can tell you that if I sat at the dinner table and discussed partial birth abortion,  my 17 year old son would not even blink and eye. But if I started discussing &#8220;dilating&#8221; my cervix and then &#8220;extracting&#8221; a dead baby&#8230;well, he&#8217;d get up and leave&#8230;We all know how men react to anything descriptive pertaining to &#8220;WOMEN&#8217;S ISSUES&#8221;   Can&#8217;t you just hear them all going &#8220;ooooooo,&#8230;gross!)</p>
<p>So go ahead, call it dilation and extraction.  And then when people ask you what that is, tell them&#8230;<br />
MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

