Seattle Abortion Clinic to Close
— Posted by John (December 14, 2006 at 1:34 pm)

In the last thirteen months, fifteen abortion clinics have closed throughout the country.
The latest is Aradia Women’s Health Center in Seattle, which will close permanently at the end of January 2007.
Operation Rescue’s Troy Newman comments:
Interestingly, [Aradia's] letter [PDF] announcing the closure repeatedly refers to the “success” of the abortion mill. When one’s business fails for financial reasons, one should hardly call that “success.” That use of language is just an example of how the abortion cartel creates their own reality with euphemisms to cover up the truth. Business failure becomes “success.” Killing babies and traumatizing women becomes “sensitive abortion care.”
With this in mind, note the headline of the Seattle Times article on Aradia’s closing:
Low-income women’s health clinic to close doors
The more that things change, the more they stay the same: Although abortion clinics are closing left and right, media bias is still alive and well.
This entry is filed under Abortion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.





CC says:
The only success in any of this is that the abortion clinic is closing!
What a good birthday present for me. =)
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 1:40 pm
mary kay says:
Happy Birthday CC!
Once again, proof that these places target undereducated and underprivileged women. If resources to help these women keep their children were made more available (gee, planned parenthood, now there’s an idea for how to better spend your money…) instead of preying on the marginalized and weak, abortion would be relegated to the history books. What did the Germans call these “low-income women”? I believe it was “useless eaters”. But it’s all just coincidence, right? I mean they aren’t actively seeking out poor, hispanic and black women in order to erase them from the planet or anything. Cuz gosh, that would be insane!
MK
MK
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 2:42 pm
johanna says:
MK, your analogy doesn’t stick. In no way does providing low-cost health care (which, yes includes contraceptives and abortion) equal Nazism. I myself have used clinics with sliding scales when I was a low-income student with no health insurance, and I am eternally grateful that it enabled me to get an annual gyno exam for free.
Sure, you can say Aradia “targeted” low income women. By providing afforable health care to uninsured women. Which is probably why they went out of business – if you read the Seattle Times article.
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 2:59 pm
CC says:
Oh, it isn’t my birthday today! But my birthday is in January, the same month this place is closing for good! =)
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 3:02 pm
Rosie says:
MK,
You are right. What makes it even more disgusting is that they will kill any race baby to ensure their cause. They do put these clinics in shady areas for a reason.
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 3:50 pm
Christina says:
Providing health care to low income women is laudable. Selling them abortions is the opposite of providing health care.
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 8:09 pm
Christina says:
What confused me is that they claimed they closed because of a 20% increase in abortions to low-income women. Wouldn’t more patients be a reason to expand, rather than to close down?
Comment posted December 14th, 2006 at 8:10 pm
mary kay says:
Johanna,
The fact is these places DO target low income women and they ARE trying to erase them from the planet. Read any article on Margaret Sanger and her ties to planned parenthood. She was a nazi sympathizer.
The thought of letting an abortionist do a pap smear on me makes me sick to my stomach. So while I understand that you used one of these places to get your “affordable” exam, I cringe at the thought of a murderers hands touching my most intimate parts no matter how inexpensive it was.
I think my analogy works just fine.
MK
Comment posted December 15th, 2006 at 5:25 am
mary kay says:
#
Christina says:
What confused me is that they claimed they closed because of a 20% increase in abortions to low-income women. Wouldn’t more patients be a reason to expand, rather than to close down?
Christina,
I think the point is that these women weren’t paying their fair share and therefore even tho there were more actual abortions being done, they were being done on women who weren’t adding to the kitty, so to speak.
I guess it’s a tradeoff. They got to eliminate more ethnically unwanted children, but they couldn’t afford to KEEP doing it.
Poor dears. I guess Seattle will just have to deal with a few more “mexican” or “black” babies actually being born. There goes the neighborhood. Imagine, a low income neighborhood and nowhere to kill their babies. tsk tsk.
MK
Comment posted December 15th, 2006 at 5:31 am
Joe says:
MK wrote, “I think my analogy works just fine.”
Me too… Dodging the Nazi analogy because one gets a free exam is brutal. Imagine if a Nazi sympathizer said on an Israeli blog, “I was in that prison camp and I got deloused, a free hair cut and a tattoo that is the best conversation started I ever owned, so you can’t really call them monsters”.
Comment posted December 15th, 2006 at 3:49 pm
Joe says:
Crud… I meant to day “coversation starter”… Can I have a do over?
Comment posted December 15th, 2006 at 3:52 pm
Joe says:
Damn I did it again
Comment posted December 15th, 2006 at 3:52 pm
girl solo anal says:
girl solo anal…
abrikoskos 262068 girl solo anal foundation…
Comment posted March 16th, 2007 at 1:37 pm