And They Expect to Be Taken Seriously?
— Posted by John (October 5, 2007 at 2:00 pm)
Last week Aurora Planned Parenthood blogger Veronica wrote:
Are you just as frustrated by the Aurora situation as I am? I know you are! Are you also frustrated by the general animosity towards women’s bodies and our reproductive rights? We’re in luck!
Then she posted information about an upcoming townhall meeting:
The Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, The Public Square at the Illinois Humanities Council, and the Jane Addams Hull-House Museum present…
Understanding Reproductive Justice:
Reclaiming Choice and Broadening the MovementThursday, October 11
5:30 to 7:00 p.m.
Jane Addams Hull-House Museum
800 South Halsted Street
Chicago
Free and open to the public.
Reservations are required.For more information or to reserve your place, contact the Illinois Caucus
for Adolescent Health online,
by e-mail, or by calling 312.427.4460 x233.
Reservations must be made by October 9
The event’s page is here.
It’s not surprising that Planned Parenthood/Chicago Area is promoting this event, as they’ve partnered with one of the host organizations, the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health (ICAH), to form a coalition whose goal is to strip all funding of abstinence education for Illinois schools and require them to use so-called comprehensive sex education programs instead.
If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you might remember ICAH.
Last year, ICAH held its annual fundraiser at Playboy’s executive offices.
That event — view the invitation here [PDF] — included a VIP reception with Playboy CEO Christie Hefner, the daughter of Hugh Hefner, who founded the magazine in 1953.
Several years ago, Christie decided that the company could make more money by producing increasingly harder-core pornography—something that even her father was reluctant to do for a long time.
This year, ICAH’s annual fundraiser—an adults-only event, of course, just like last year’s—promised “A Neo-Burlesque performance” by stripper Michelle L’amour.
If you go to Michelle L’amour’s website (as you’ll see below, it should be obvious why I won’t link directly to her site), you get a message that says this:
Disclaimer
The Official Michelle L’amour website contains depictions and discussions of a sensual and/or sexual nature. Though this site is NOT pornographic, it is not intended for viewers under the age of 18 and should not be viewed by such. By entering this site you certify that you are over the age of 18, otherwise legally able to access this sort of material and are not offended by it. By deciding to view this site you are agreeing that you morally consent to such material (that includes but is not limited to frank and often humorous depictions and/or discussions of a sexual nature). You further agree to hold the performer known as Michelle L’amour and the creator(s) of this website harmless in any legal matter that might arise from your viewing of or gathering information from this website. If you feel in any way that such material as is contained herein might offend you on any level you should not proceed.
Doesn’t this tell us everything we need to know about the values being pushed on our kids by the supporters of so-called comprehensive sex education?
You have to wonder how an organization whose events feature pornographers and strippers can possibly expect to be taken seriously when they claim to know what our children should be taught about sex.
Previous Coverage
- Sex Education Fundraiser to Feature Stripper
- More Evidence that “Comprehensive” Sex Education Is a Bad Idea
- Have a Listen
- What Really Goes On In “Comprehensive” Sex Ed Class
- Very Sad
- Playboy in Bed with “Comprehensive” Sex Ed
- When did Playboy Become Respectable?
This entry is filed under Abortion, Culture Wars, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.





lauren says:
Social conservatives should grow up. If they want to rally around somebody, why don’t try that? Huckabee needs support and money now. If the social conservatives are half as important as they think they are, they would rally around one of these people [..] And then decide what you care about. If you care about judges, then you’re gonna get satisfied by Giuliani, then get in line and play politics. But there’s a vanity in this group right now. They call themselves “values voters.” I’ve news for them: 100% of the American electorate are values voters; they vote their values…And this, this, kind of semantic imperialism that they have where they say “we vote values”. Everyone else votes what?— George Will said this today i liked it.
Comment posted October 7th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Quinn says:
Earth to Lauren!
The difference between “values voters” and the rest who you allege vote based on a set of values is that “values voters” actually have a hard core set of values that their vote is based upon.
The rest just vote for the guy they find the most likeable and who they believe might put more money in their pocket (through taxing the “rich” or giving tax cuts to the….”not rich”).
Comment posted October 8th, 2007 at 2:33 am
Lauren says:
I vote my values. My values are different than yours. Are you really to arrogant enough to believe that your values are supreme to all others?
Comment posted October 8th, 2007 at 9:53 pm
Lauren says:
Umm. and I come from a pretty well-off family and I don’t vote for anyone to put money in my pocket, although I do believe student loans should be more accessible and college more affordable. I vote for a fair and progressive tax system. Are you really that greedy?
Comment posted October 8th, 2007 at 9:54 pm
Molly says:
Does anyone ever listen to the youth about these things? ‘Cause I can tell you that most of the kids I know would prefer abstinence-only education.
Umm… Lauren, that’s not really what this post is about…
Comment posted October 9th, 2007 at 7:12 pm
John says:
Molly,
Well said!
Comment posted October 15th, 2007 at 8:32 am
Generations for Life » Blog Archive » What Works and What Doesn’t Work says:
[…] And They Expect to Be Taken Seriously? […]
Comment posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:16 pm
Generations for Life » Blog Archive » In the News says:
[…] And They Expect to Be Taken Seriously? […]
Comment posted September 5th, 2008 at 12:27 pm